In the Matter of J.F., N.J. Super. App. Div. (per curiam) (14 pp.) Sole
beneficiary under a will appealed the probate order approving the settlement of
the first and final formal accounting of the guardian who managed the
incapacitated deceased’s estate during her final years. Beneficiary alleged
that guardian failed to list a Florida condominium at a reasonable price,
objected to the upkeep and repair charges for the property, objected to the
costs for trips to Florida, argued accounting fees were unreasonable and argued
guardian’s income and commission should be forfeit for her “willful gross
misconduct.” The trial judge rejected all of the beneficiary’s exceptions and
beneficiary appealed. The court found that there was no evidence to show a
breach of fiduciary duty in guardian’s handling of the Florida property and the
trips to Florida were necessary to assess and marshal her ward’s assets and
were for the ward’s benefit. Additionally, N.J. law granted a fiduciary the
authority to employ accountants. Furthermore, the trial court did not abuse its
discretion in awarding counsel fees to guardian.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment